Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Drunella coloradensis / flavilinea



Millcreek has attached these 10 pictures to aid in identification. The message is below.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.1X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Dorsal view, specimen 1.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Dorsal view, specimen 1.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.1X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 1.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 1.
View Full SizeView Full Size (1.9X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013.Dorsal view, specimen 2.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013.Dorsal view, specimen 2.
View Full SizeView Full Size (1.8X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 2.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 2.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.2X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Dorsal view, specimen 3.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Dorsal view, specimen 3.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.2X larger)
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 3.
In alcohol, collected April 3, 2013. Ventral view, specimen 3.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.1X larger)
Live specimen, collected April 18, 2014.
Live specimen, collected April 18, 2014.
View Full SizeView Full Size (2.3X larger)
Live specimen, collected April 18, 2014.
Live specimen, collected April 18, 2014.
Shown Full Size
View Full SizeView Full Size (1.1X larger)
MillcreekJuly 17th, 2014, 7:21 pm
Healdsburg, CA

Posts: 356
These nymphs are common in the Russian River from mid-February to late April (at least as late instars). I keep going back and forth between D.coloradensis
and D. flavilinea without resolving the issue. I know a lot of folks say to just leave it at D. coloradensis / flavilinea but I thought I'd run it by the folks here and see what you have to say. Size ranges from 9-16 mm (excluding cerci). I put a fairly large number of pictures here to show the range of color variation.
EntomanJuly 17th, 2014, 9:15 pm
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Boy you sure pick the fun ones, Mark. :) These are photos of flavilinea, at least for now...

The problem for us in CA is that nymphal specimens of these guys meld characters used in the keys from both species. Your excellent photos show prime examples of this. The standard is still Allen & Edmunds '62. They mention this problem with these species in CA and I'm not aware of any later studies that resolve it. Even with this problem in mind, A & E came to the conclusion that they are flavilinea everywhere excepting the Northeastern part of the state where coloradensis holds sway. Based on that I am comfortable with calling yours flavilinea - at least until new research becomes available...;)
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
MillcreekJuly 17th, 2014, 11:30 pm
Healdsburg, CA

Posts: 356
Hey Kurt, if I can't carry the load myself I'll hand it to someone else.:)

I used A & E '62 to key the specimens out. I was going with flavilinea myself until I looked at Meyer and McCafferty's Mayflies of California (2008).
While they don't list coloradensis in Sonoma County they do have them listed for Marin and Lake as well as several other counties in NW CA. The problem there is they are based on larval specimens and someone could have confused them with flavilinea. I'm still straddling the fence on this one.
EntomanJuly 18th, 2014, 2:11 am
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Yeah, that survey has always been a bit of a puzzle to me. If the key's authors describe them as unworkable for our region, how did workers make determinations in that species survey using them? My hunch is we got us a whole lot o' intergradin' goin' on round heah! :) The grandis sub-species have a similar problem where their ranges overlap.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
MillcreekJuly 21st, 2014, 4:37 pm
Healdsburg, CA

Posts: 356
Took a look at the manual Luke Jacobus and compadres put together for SAFIT and am now inclined to go with Drunella flavilinea because of the broadly triangular spines (at least in relation to Drunella coloradensis).

Unless of course your comment turns out to be correct.
My hunch is we got us a whole lot o' intergradin' goin' on round heah! :)
PC or not, it sure made me laugh.
EntomanJuly 21st, 2014, 8:45 pm
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Well, Foghorn Leghorn aside, that was the gist of A&E's paper regarding our state. Intergrades between the two species where their ranges overlap coupled with the curious phenomenon of specimens of both becoming more spiny as their ranges move westward toward the coast renders their keys unworkable for us. Sure like to know how the later M&M paper determined that coloradensis inhabits our coastal counties.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
MillcreekJuly 21st, 2014, 9:29 pm
Healdsburg, CA

Posts: 356
I suspect that another quote, one from Cool Hand Luke might sum it up. The warden of the chain gang when he addresses the convicts, "What we have here is a failure to communicate."
EntomanJuly 21st, 2014, 10:27 pm
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
:)

"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
PaulRobertsJuly 22nd, 2014, 5:00 am
Colorado

Posts: 1776
Nice discussion guys. Thanks.
CrepuscularJuly 22nd, 2014, 9:25 am
Boiling Springs, PA

Posts: 923
Well, Foghorn Leghorn aside, that was the gist of A&E's paper regarding our state. Intergrades between the two species where their ranges overlap coupled with the curious phenomenon of specimens of both becoming more spiny as their ranges move westward toward the coast renders their keys unworkable for us. Sure like to know how the later M&M paper determined that coloradensis inhabits our coastal counties.


What? Variation among the Ephemerellids, no way...

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: Chloroperlidae
In Isoperla Stonefly Adult by Teamrenna
3Sep 9, 2008
by GONZO
Re: flav
In General Discussion by Lastchance
6Jan 17, 2012
by Doublespey
Re: Caddisfly adult ID
In the Insect Order Trichoptera by Dryfly
3Dec 19, 2009
by Creno
Re: Hecuba
In General Discussion by Sayfu
12Aug 14, 2012
by Sayfu
Re: From tying to identifying
In the Identify This! Board by Jman
2Jun 6, 2008
by Jman
Re: Anyone know your western Drunella species?
In Female Drunella doddsii Mayfly Dun by Troutnut
23Apr 12, 2012
by Entoman
Re: Insect Identification Caddisfly
In the Identify This! Board by Dkuhn
10Oct 1, 2008
by Creno
Help with Pteronarcys species characters?
In Pteronarcys biloba Stonefly Nymph by GONZO
0
Re: Mayfly Workshop: 3-5 Jan, 2013; LongBeach, CA, USA
In General Discussion by Konchu
2Nov 28, 2012
by Brookyman
Re: Small Sulphurs
In Male Ephemerella dorothea dorothea Mayfly Dun by GONZO
3Jul 22, 2014
by Entoman