Blog & Latest Updates
Fly Fishing Articles
Insects by Common Name
or register. |
Gripngrin | November 25th, 2006, 5:31 pm | |
Front Range - Colorado Posts: 17 | "I've been thinking of upgrading to something digital for my nature/stream photography, but at this stage of my life am on something of a budget. I currently use Pentax compatible lenses and would like to continue to do so with a new camera body. Do any of you have specific recommendations for a good used camera? Which is better, a digital SLR or straight digital?" Konchum | |
Grip'n Grin Mike | ||
Gripngrin | November 25th, 2006, 5:54 pm | |
Front Range - Colorado Posts: 17 | Konchu- If your Pentex lens work on their new digi bodies (K2, K, KA, KAF, and KAF2 Mount), certainly consider that choice. Their new body is a serious contender feature wise, and has garnered good reviews. See: www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/istds2.html For this quality of a DSLR, the price is very competitive, around $400 I think. I shoot Canon. During my transition from film to digi, I originally shot a Nikon D100 because of a decent lens collection from film days. After a year it became obvious that Canon has many advantages over Nikon and sold my Nikon system. Both Nikon & Canon lens' are comparable, quality wise. In my opinion, Canon's imaging processing technology is superior. Nikon shooters please chime-in here. Again, if you have some decent lens that will work on a new body, do it! A decent P&S digi cam will cost as much as the strait Pentex body. Mike | |
Grip'n Grin Mike | ||
Konchu | November 25th, 2006, 6:18 pm | |
Site Editor IndianaPosts: 505 | Thanks, Mike, for starting the new thread. | |
Troutnut | November 25th, 2006, 7:14 pm | |
Administrator Bellevue, WAPosts: 2737 | Going strictly by picture quality, a DSLR is your best bet. It's also best if you're looking for maximum custom control over all the camera's functions. I don't know the specifics of Pentax equipment at all because I use Canon, so I'll defer to Mike's judgement on that. There are a few exceptions, normal digital cameras with very high quality and plenty of custom control over exposure parameters. The Panasonic Lumix DLC-LX2 comes to mind, based on the reviews I've seen (I haven't used it). But as a general rule DSLRs are better. Portability/durability is a really big factor, too. It's a real pain to carry a DSLR everywhere you go, and it's a big enough investment you'll want to be very careful with it (which gets annoying around the water). A compact digicam is easier to carry around all the time and to protect, especially if you get a waterproof one (like the Pentax waterproof line). | |
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D. Troutnut and salmonid ecologist | ||
Title | Replies | Last Reply |
Re: Some prospective brookie waters and a delightful surprise! (6 more) In the Photography Board by Jmd123 | 4 | May 30, 2011 by PaulRoberts |
Re: Troutnut's 2012 caribou hunt in the Alaska Range In Site Updates by Troutnut | 17 | Oct 4, 2012 by PaulRoberts |
Re: Camera Advice In the Photography Board by JOHNW | 10 | Nov 7, 2009 by Martinlf |
Re: Nikon D40 Help? In the Photography Board by Capitata | 4 | Nov 7, 2009 by Martinlf |
Re: My first aquatic insect photos; open for identification In the Photography Board by Bcvizina | 4 | Mar 16, 2010 by Wiflyfisher |
Re: Macro Insect Photography In the Photography Board by DOS | 2 | Mar 1, 2009 by Creno |
Re: Chimarra In the Photography Board by Crepuscular | 7 | Nov 30, 2013 by LowBudget |
Re: Montana Spring Creeks (4 more) In the Photography Board by Wbranch | 15 | Apr 30, 2014 by Wbranch |
Re: More Free Stuff In the Photography Board by Wbranch | 3 | Jan 28, 2012 by Wbranch |
Re: Lost my waterproof camera In the Photography Board by Crepuscular | 5 | Apr 4, 2012 by Jesse |